Wednesday, February 16, 2011

all that is gold

all that is gold does not glitter

not all those who wander are lost
~J.R.R.Tolkein

Yes, I’m back to blogging in the middle of the night. Although, it’s 6:30am – can that really count? Let’s say it does because it's still dark. You know how drunk dials are bad because you usually end up saying something true and embarrassing? Middle-of-the-night blogging is like that, even without alcohol.

I’m vaguely unemployed again, so I’ve reverted back to my natural schedule of sleeping all day and hanging out on the internets all night. Perez Hilton is a good place to go. As is Twitter. There are all sorts of interesting things to do on the internet at four in the morning. I reorganized my bookshelf the other night. Nothing says “I don’t know what I’m doing with my life” like putting dvds in their proper cases.

Except, I do know what I’m doing with my life. I like being up at this time while everyone’s asleep. I am looking for a job, and I’m in school, so technically I can say “I’m a student” instead of “unemployed” (which just sounds awful – like I have a five o’clock shadow and mismatched slippers). Oh! And I’m doing really well on my book-a-week resolution for 2011. I’m at nine books so far, and we’ve only been through six and a half weeks.

I admit – I’ve consumed zero Mai Tais this year. But the year is young! Surely if time gets short, I can make it up on New Year’s Eve…

The downside of this particular stint of unemployment/fooling around with life – is the sun.

My parents owned this magical house for a number of years. They sold it in 2008, and I admit I haven’t quite gotten over it. It was the perfect house for hanging out, dreaming, and running around naked in the backyard (not that we ever did that). It had some beautiful suns. The kitchen had a breakfast nook with glass on three sides. There was always sun in there. Countless sunsets were enjoyed around that table. The other sun was the dawn, which is the best part of consciousness at 6am.

The park on the next block was set between my house and my friend’s house. In high school in the summers, we would hang out until dawn – sometimes reading – and then I’d walk home. I usually stopped at the park and walked around in the mist. No one is ever around in suburbia at that time. There was a set of swings that overlooked some houses and gardens, but it also had a great view of the eastern sky. I could sit there and watch the colours of the sunrise and read once the sun came up. My relationship with the dawn began in that park. I say the house was magical because it really was.

Side note: That house was also the location of the jello party – need I say more?

After they sold the house I moved downtown where I also saw a lot of dawns. I worked at a bar, so often I was up at that time just because I came home from work and took the time to check my email before going to sleep. Those were beautiful dawns as well because I could see trees and two castles from my apartment balcony. There was an aqua glass apartment building across the street, and the glass caught every colour of the rainbow.

Now I live in a different city where there are no castles in sight. My apartment is a great location; it’s close to the subway, grocery stores, nightclubs, and friends. It's also the home of my muscular travel companion, which is a bonus. The view from the balcony leaves everything to be desired; it's nothing but rooftops and concrete buildings. Literally. And even if I left the apartment at this hour, there would be no where to go. One does not wander through parks at dawn in big cities, not that there are any parks close by. One can wander in suburbia. I wish it wasn’t like this. I love city-living.

I miss dawn and I miss colours. I miss walking on the grass. I miss seeing grass. This isn’t just city. This is winter. God, I hate winter. Even as I write this at 6:32, I can’t see any light through the blinds.

So clearly I like my time alone at night for other reasons. Staying up this late in the winter is truly not for the weak. There’s no dawn or birds, or castles or water. There are no Mai Tais or the security of simply being a high school student on summer vacation in her parents’ house. Life is hard. There is unemployment and concrete and darkness. There is no sign of thaw.

Even so, life is good – maybe I’ll go get a Mai Tai one of these days – and it’ll be better in the spring.


Thursday, January 13, 2011

ableism*

Discrimination, I imagine, looks different to everyone depending on where they’re coming from. It’s relative: the discrimination happening to me always looks worse than the discrimination happening to you.

The government of Canada recognizes me as a visible minority, which is kind of funny. I look “white”**. I am white (half). I hesitate to say I act white, because I don’t think there’s such a way to act (and please see the footnote). But I was born and grew up in Canada. My attitudes and way of looking at the world were pretty much standard in comparison with my classmates. That’s how white I act. But the government says that because my father is ethnically Indian (like, from India … even though he’s never been there) his children will be acknowledged to be “visible minorities” as well. Sure. Fine. But I can still pass as white.***

So I’ve never encountered any racism directed at me before. I’ve encountered some racism directed at Indians or “mixed” people before, but upon revealing my ethnicity, the offender in question has always backed off, looking shocked at they weren’t talking to, you know, one of them. Most recently I was on the receiving end of a lovely comment what went something like, “&%$#ing brown people – they’re always so ____” until I coughed and pointed out that I’m half Indian to get him to shut up, at which point the he corrected himself and said he was mostly talking about “&%$#ing Pakis” anyway. Incidentally, that was not less offensive. I don’t think. Like I said, I encounter almost no racism directed at me.

I’m not going to count the racism directed at white people I’ve encountered because white is the majority here, and I don’t think that racism does as much damage as the other kind, though I could be wrong. It still separates us.

The most bit of discrimination I get directed at me either directly or indirectly is sexism. And yes, to me it feels like it must be the worse kind of discrimination out there. Maybe it is. But I’m probably in no position to make that call if that’s the only one I experience.

Last summer, however, I was suddenly privy to another form of discrimination: Ableism, which Wikipedia describes as a form of discrimination or social prejudice against people with disabilities.

You see, I broke my foot. It was stupid – I misjudged where the stair banister was and kicked it quite hard in my attempt to step past it. The lighting was okay, I was completely sober. It was a stupid, stupid accident. I tell you this because no one bought my story about saving orphans from a fire…

Monday, December 20, 2010

books of 2010

It’s nearing the end of the year, so I thought I’d pull out the list of what I’ve read this year. I admit, back in January I was terribly curious to track my reading habits and see what it is I’m doing with my life, but March through October … I couldn’t really care less about what I was reading. Perhaps because I, like any God-fearing Canadian, was out enjoying weather that didn’t bring to mind that scene from The Day After Tomorrow. You know the one*. So naturally, come December, I again find myself wondering what I’ve been reading all year.

I have compiled what is probably an incomplete list. This does not include all the submissions to the agency, short stories, fanfiction, essays and blogs I’ve read this year. Which may or may not count for a lot.

I would like to start off with my three favourites:

1) The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins

Everything I want in a book. Everything. (Except, possibly, a masked ball, but I tend to look for that more in a visual medium.) I honestly expected The Demon’s Covenant to be my favourite book of the year, and The Hunger Games … does everyone remember when Romeo was all hung up on Roseline? How he never thought he could love anything more? It is the east, and The Hunger Games is the sun. The dark, children-eating sun.

2) The Demon’s Covenant, Sarah Rees Brennan

It is unfair to begin by comparing this book to Rosaline from R+J. This book shines too, like the glint of the sun on a blade. The Demon books are so, so enjoyable. I laughed, I cried, I debated over and over which brother I would want more… and can’t decide. I have loved almost everything Rees Brennan has written for years. This one is no exception. The second book in a trilogy. I was so happy to see the characters again. Am dying for the third. (Expect it on next year’s list.)

3) C’Mon Papa, Ryan Knighton

Okay, this one is actually not predictable. It’s a story about blind fatherhood. Something I have so much in common with. Except it was extremely … relatable? Is that the right word? And hilarious. Knighton kind of writes like Stephen King when King isn’t being terrifying. I love King, but I don’t love the terrifying, so naturally this book is amazing. It is touching and unexpected. I highly recommend it to everyone, blind father or not.


Honourable mentions:

The Time Traveler’s Wife, Audrey Niffenegger (made me cry in public)

Under the Dome, Stephen King (made me cry in public for entirely different reasons)


And here’s the list in full**, and in no particular order:

City of Glass, Cassandra Clare
Artemis Fowl, Lost Colony, Eoin Colfer
Artemis Fowl, Time Paradox, Eoin Colfer
Artemis Fowl: Atlantis Complex, Eoin Colfer
Demon’s Lexicon (x2), Sarah Rees Brennan
Demon’s Covenant (x 3), Sarah Rees Brennan
Disgrace, J. M. Coetzee
Order of the Phoenix, J.K. Rowling
The Wife's Tale, Lori Lansens
Widdershins, Charles de Lint
Clockwork Angel, Cassandra Clare
Super Freakonimics, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner
Bridget Jones’s Diary, Helen Fielding
The Hunger Games (x 2), Suzanne Collins
Catching Fire (x 2), Suzanne Collins
Mockingjay (x 2), Suzane Collins
Deathly Hallows, J.K. Rowling
Breaking Dawn, Stephenie Meyer
The Time Traveler’s Wife, Audrey Niffenegger
The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie, Alan Bradley
C’Mon Papa, Ryan Knighton
Under the Dome, Stephen King
Eragon, Christopher Paolini
Something Blue, Emily Giffin
Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World, Haruki Murakami
Cockeyed, Ryan Knighton

It seems I’ve read 26 books this year, 31 if you count the ones I’ve read twice. That’s about a book every two weeks. Is that good? I don’t know. Considering I inhaled The Hunger Games in a day, I feel I could do better.

Aim for 2011 – read: 52 books, earn: 52 dollars/hour, drink: 52 Mai Tais.

I feel these aren’t bad goals.



* I’ve never seen this movie, nor the scene in question, but I’ve heard it mentioned often enough that I feel I can reference it with some accuracy.

** Some of these books I have not finished, but more or less intend to before the year is out. This does not include Widdershins, which I found a huge let-down after reading The Blue Girl by the same author, and do not intend to finish. It serves me right for starting in the middle of a series - although it worked with the Harry Potter series that one time.

Sunday, November 21, 2010

the problem with good writing

This week I did not read about breasts once. (I know, my life has become sad and empty.) In fact, for all the questionable manuscripts I read last week, I must have read twice that number of really good samples of writing.

I don't know what's worse.

The problem with the good ones is that most of them are missing one crucial factor, just that extra je ne sais quois to make it spectacular. It might be underdeveloped characters, stilted dialogue, a weak premise. And that's harder. To read about each character's breasts thrice on each page makes my life easy; it's a fairly quick rejection. To read the good stuff with the interesting plot and carefully constructed characters makes it quite difficult. I want to respond to each manuscript with things like, "Please keep writing!", "Revise and submit again in six months!",  "I love the part where Cynthia tells Jake she loves him for the first time but it's already too late because he's accepted the job in Asia and married the woman from the prologue!"

But I can't. No one can. Sadly, there are not enough hours in a day to write out detailed reviews of everything I liked and didn't like. Once I thought a story showed a lot of promise, but it was so not the genre my agency looks for, so I took the time to look up the information of another agent who does rep the genre, and I passed along the info. This will probably not happen again. There are not enough hours in a day.

As a result, I do give serious attention to every piece of writing I read. It's a big responsibility having other people send in their stories for consideration. I know all of them have put in serious work, so I must give serious consideration. I do. Like I said, it's tough not being able to do more in terms of feedback for the ones that get rejected. (Except for that guy with the breasts. Oh my God, I don't think I'll ever recover from that one.)

But just because I (or any agency) cannot give more feedback, doesn't mean that no one can.

http://www.critters.org/ is a good website for fantasy and sci-fi writers to receive feedback. This website also makes it a requirement that members give detailed feedback about other writing as well, which is super useful because it means you have to take the time and figure out what did and did not work for a certain piece. As a writer, once you start seeing what does and does not work, you will be able to see those things in your own writing. Really, feedback and critiquing are equally useful.

http://www.publishersmarketplace.com/ - this is another good website for finding agents. Like I said, some of the really good stuff I see just isn't right for the agency I represent, but there could be other agencies out there who are interested.

In conclusion, there is lot of good writing out there. A rejection doesn't mean it can't be published, a thoughtless response doesn't mean your story was thoughtlessly reviewed, and ultimately: a breast doesn't mean an intern will automatically reject a manuscript.

(But within reason, people, within reason...)

Sunday, November 14, 2010

life at a literary agency (and breasts!)

I’ve recently started an internship at a literary agency, which I’m very much enjoying. Literary agents are the step in between authors and publishing houses, for those of you who don’t know. It is possible to get a novel published without an agent, but I wouldn’t advise it; most publishers won’t read unsolicited manuscripts, and agents will know which editors to get your novel to. Agents will negotiate the best deal financially.

At the end of my first full week, I’ve already learned a lot.

Like … what not to do when trying to get a novel published.

I get to read many of the submissions that come in, and a number are well-written, interesting, addressed politely and have followed the submission guidelines. These are not the majority.

Though our submission guidelines are clearly posted on the website, which ask for a hard copy, there are many people who seem to be confused by this. I get emails every day (usually addressed: “Dear Sir or Madam”) asking for representation, and often with no message about the novel in question. When referring one individual to our submission guidelines on the website, he acknowledged that he had read them, but asked for a five minute phone call or in-person meeting with the agent (whom he didn’t address by name). He insisted that he wouldn’t be doing this if he didn’t know his novel would be a best-seller.

Readers, do I take his word for it?

In this business, like in most businesses, business etiquette will only get you far. When seeking representation, ask politely, address the agent by name, include information about the novel, and above all, follow the submission guidelines. If someone hasn’t bothered to read the guidelines, I can only assume they haven’t bothered to write a decent novel. Every single submission whether it comes by email or by post is read and considered, but the ones that don’t follow the guidelines have done themselves a huge disservice. Whoever ends up reading it at the agency is already annoyed that they’re reading yet another person’s email who couldn’t be bothered to take the time to read the guidelines.

The ones that come in having followed the guidelines are already miles ahead. I kind of want to see them all represented. And isn’t that something you want the agency thinking as they go through your submission?

I’ve heard other agents going on and on asking people to follow the guidelines, and I see now how much restraint they’re actually showing.


For those interested, I’ve also noticed a few reoccurring traits that rejected manuscripts share:

1) Breasts. Breastsbreastsbreasts. I just read a manuscript that had breasts mentioned – in no connection with the plot – on page 3 (twice), 4, 5 (twice), 6, 8 and 9 (twice). Then I stopped reading. Sure, most female characters will have breasts, and sure, most straight male writers will think about them at some point. But I don’t want to read a story and be left with the impression that the author was thinking about sex (and breasts!) the whole time. I read another manuscript where every single female character was sexualized in some way by the end of the third chapter – in no connection to the plot. Again, sure, male protagonists will think about other characters’ breasts. But do we need detailed physical descriptions of all the side female characters in the story when we have yet to learn what the two male leads look like? I don’t want a book like that, and I doubt most men want a book like that – if they’re looking for breasts, they’re looking at porn.

2) The assurance that this novel will make an excellent movie. Are you writing a novel or a screenplay? Because we represent only novels. (As stated in our submission guidelines.)

3) Self-insertion. The really cool guy syndrome. The beautiful girl whom everyone wants – she can’t even walk down the street without leaving a trail of broken hearts in her wake. You know what I mean. Go on – give the character a flaw or two. Maybe the guy lost his smokin’ Ferrari to his gambling addiction, maybe the girl has cast a spell that went horribly wrong and she’s left with the guilt of destroying every marriage in town. I don’t know. But it would make the story more interesting.


That’s all for today. Tune in next week for when I snap and lobby to have our submission guidelines re-written saying we don’t accept manuscripts with a single mention of breasts.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

sea lions and bondage

My first experience with Skype was an interesting one. The voice I spoke to had an odd metallic twang about it, giving my friend the appearance of one of those semi-sexy computer voices in Science Fiction movies letting the hero know: “Enemies. Approaching.” Or: “No longer. Listening.” Or even: “Going. For a. Smoke.” So it always seemed a little bit like talking to a non-human entity, which was kind of exciting until it would randomly disconnect, leaving me crouched in my tiny kitchen (because I don’t want to wake up my boyfriend in the other room) with an odd assortment of furniture, in the middle of the night, whispering something no one can hear anymore like, “…my co-worker keeps giving me the crazy-eye!” and feeling slightly unhinged.

I just want to give readers a clear view of my mental state when I did this next bit. (And seriously – the unpleasant sensation of suddenly realizing that you’re talking to yourself in less than ideal conditions* is akin to looking and looking for that thing you saw just yesterday, and remembering you last saw it on Ebay next to a set of taupe oven-mitts** today.)

So after a couple of random disconnects and re-dials, I find myself in a conversation in which my computer-voice-friend is telling me about the sea lions she saw the other day. I google sea lions just to be sure we’re talking about the same animal, and end up on the Wikipedia page for these adorable animals (we were).

Maybe it was the computer’s fault for going on about sea lions for longer than I could possibly be interested, or maybe it was mine for thinking the scenario mentioned in the first paragraph could lead to anything other than a further loss of grip on reality, but whatever the case, I found myself thinking, I wonder if I could get from Sea Lions to, like, BDSM by following related links on Wikipedia.

The answer was, of course, yes. Yes, I could. But the real question was how many links it would take. Place your bets now.

Annnnnd done. All bets should now be in.

The answer is fifteen. Notice how to be fair I wrote out the number and included it in part of a larger paragraph so your eye couldn’t automatically catch it while being asked to place your bets?*** I aim to please, I aim to please. And what would really please is to know the path I took to get there, right?**** So here it is:

SEA LIONS

- TROPICS
- WINTER
- JACK FROST
- HOGFATHER
- SUSAN STO HELIT
- PROTAGONIST
- THEATRE OF ANCIENT GREECE (because I thought Ancient Greece: there’s plenty of sex there, right?)
- CLASSICAL GREECE (Wrong. Not according to Wikipedia. I had to keep trying.)
- ALEXANDER THE GREAT
- CULTURAL DEPICTIONS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT
- ALEXANDER (film) (Because I was reaching now, desperate to kind a link between sea lions and bondage. The computer had moved on to more interesting topics at this point, I’m sure, or hell, maybe I was talking at this point, but the chase continued…)
- SEX IN FILM
- PORNOGRAPHIC FILM
- LIST OF PORNOGRAPHIC SUB-GENRES

BDSM


And you know? The quest seems kind of empty in retrospect, like there’s still more to life I haven’t figured out. More than fun with Wikipedia and Blogs and talking to my laptop. More than figuring out how many of the 26 items I blogged about last time made it into this post. (There were 5, but anyone who placed bets gets to win for simply reading the footnotes as they came up and knowing about this exciting, one-time offer fake betting opportunity!)

… I’m going to bed.




*Are there ideal conditions in which to talk to oneself? I don’t know. Despite everything about me, I don’t really engage in this harmlessly deranged behaviour. Really.

**Did this really happen to me? You don’t know!

***Not real bets. I ask for bets to make the narrative sound more exciting. Though there will be another opportunity to place bets on a number later in this blog post. Place bets on that number… NOW!

****Or to know I’m locked in a room with soft walls? No such luck, I’m afraid. I’m still here in my tiny kitchen in the middle of the night writing a blog post about sea lions and bondage.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

for Nika, because I take requests

I've had a blog post requested. It's from one of my three readers, and since I would like to cater to my fans, I'll do it. I'm a little bit out of ideas at the moment, but google still solves everything, and has inspired this post. I shall merely go through the alphabet with google, and you, dear readers, will get my opinion on each item that comes up when I type in a single letter.

A) Air Canada: Picking airlines is always so difficult. Which is cheaper? Which flight has fewer connections? If I leave on a Monday, can I extend my trip a day? Is the alcohol included? Don't bother. Each and every airline will eventually screw you out of several thousand dollars and a few days of your life. You will miss a connection and have your luggage lost with all of them. Why not fly Air Canada?

B) BMO: This is a bank. Like airlines, banks will generally screw you, too. I'm not with BMO, but I'm sure they also have hidden fees. I hope C is better.

C) Canadian Tire: Not really. I have fond memories of going here with my dad when I was a kid. My sister and I would run through the aisles. Later in life, we bought an inflatable kiddie tub from this store which we then filled with jello and had people wrestle in during a memorable party. The pool held out.